Login / ATO risk
Risky logins deserve reasons
Login protection products often stop at “unusual” without enough context for your support team. AbuseGraph returns a defendable verdict on sign-in — and keeps watching for exposure after the session succeeds.
Where AbuseGraph wins
Same check model as signup
One API shape for signup and login — simpler mental model for engineers and agents.
Linked-account awareness
See when a login shares graph edges with known abuse.
Customer-owned enforcement
Challenge or block in your product — no forced third-party wall.
Post-login exposure watch
Alerts when credentials show new exposure later.
| AbuseGraph | Typical login protection tools | |
|---|---|---|
| Sign-in verdict | Yes — with reasons | Anomaly flag or MFA prompt |
| Shared with signup | Same check API | Often separate products |
| Graph / multi-account | Included | Enterprise-only common |
| Pricing | Per check — public | MAU or suite bundle |
When specialists still win
IdP-native step-up only
If you only need MFA step-up inside your identity provider and no external risk API, start there.
FAQ
Does this replace MFA?
No. Use AbuseGraph to decide when to step up. MFA stays in your identity stack.
Can we shadow-mode first?
Yes. Log verdicts without enforcing, then tighten rules and lists as you gain confidence.